- The Wolf on Wealth
- Posts
- Google's Best Investments
Google's Best Investments
Google turned $ 3.5B into $ 500B by building dependencies, not chasing returns.
đź‘‹ Good Morning. Google's 2005 Android acquisition seemed unremarkable at the time. Two decades later, it revealed a pattern nobody saw coming.
Read time: 3 minutes | 832 words
PRESIDENT’S DAY SALE
I'm opening my President's Day Sale early: 85% off all courses, plus exclusive access to my live March training. Twenty minutes of persuasion strategies that separate closers from amateurs. Sale ends soon.
Use code “NEWSLETTER” for early access.
STORY
How Google Built Tomorrow's Infrastructure

In 2005, when Google was still just known for search, they made a quiet $50 million acquisition that Wall Street barely noticed. A struggling 22-month-old startup called Android was building software for digital cameras. The founders had recently pivoted to mobile operating systems, but couldn't find investors.
Google wrote the check anyway.
That $50 million decision set off a two-decade investment spree that would reshape the internet, artificial intelligence, and human connectivity. Here's the scoreboard:
2005: Android - $50 million Now powers 70% of the world's 3.9 billion smartphones. Conservative estimates put the value north of $400 billion.
2006: YouTube - $1.65 billion Critics called it the worst acquisition in tech history. Today it generates $30+ billion annually and owns online video.
2013: Uber - $258 million Google Ventures' largest bet ever at the time. That stake grew 20x to over $5 billion before exit.
2014: DeepMind - $500+ million When AI was still science fiction, Google bought the London lab that would later beat world champions at Go and revolutionize protein folding.
2015: SpaceX - $900 million Partnered with Fidelity for a $1 billion round when reusable rockets were fantasy. Recently reported $8 billion unrealized gain in a single quarter.
2015: CrowdStrike - $100 million Led the Series C when endpoint security was still hardware boxes. The cybersecurity giant now trades at $90+ billion market cap.
2024: AST SpaceMobile - $155 million strategic investment Betting on satellites that connect directly to smartphones, eliminating dead zones globally.
The total invested: roughly $3.5 billion over 20 years.
The combined value created: north of $500 billion.
But here's what everyone misses - Google wasn't optimizing for returns. They were building dependencies. Android needed maps. YouTube needed cloud infrastructure. SpaceX needed data centers. Each investment created another hook into Google's ecosystem.
While competitors chased quarterly earnings, Google spent two decades building the platforms everything else would run on. They didn't just predict the future. They bought the companies building it, then made sure those companies needed Google to survive.
FROM JORDAN BELFORT:
I'm opening my President's Day Sale early with exclusive 85% off all courses for my email list first.
Here's the bigger bonus: secure your spot in the live virtual training in March (date TBD). Once this sale ends, training access closes.
This isn't a replay or generic webinar. You get a live, exclusive 20-minute session where I break down the exact persuasion strategies that separate amateurs from closers—core material that instantly changes how you communicate, sell, and influence.
Short, focused, built for real results. If you've been waiting for the right time to jump in, this is it.
Use code “NEWSLETTER” for early access.
INSIGHT + ACTION
🎯 The Infrastructure Dependency Play

Google didn't build a portfolio. They built a trap where every major platform needs them to function.
Invest in layers, not categories - Google didn't chase "mobile" or "AI" or "space." They bought the operating system (Android), the compute power (DeepMind), the connectivity (SpaceX/AST). When you invest, ask: "What does this control that others will need?" The most valuable assets aren't products - they're dependencies.
Buy before the pivot proves out - Android was pivoting from cameras to mobile. YouTube was bleeding cash on bandwidth. DeepMind had zero revenue. Google didn't wait for proof - they bought the infrastructure bet before the business model materialized. The best acquisitions happen when the founder knows where they're going but the market doesn't believe them yet.
Make your investments need you back - Android runs on Google Maps. YouTube runs on Google Cloud. SpaceX uses Google's data centers. Every investment became a two-way dependency. When you invest or acquire, immediately ask: "How do we become essential to their success?" Create lock-in through infrastructure, not just capital.
Strategic beats financial every time - CrowdStrike returned 900x. SpaceX returned 20x in a decade. But Google didn't invest for multiples - they invested to control the platforms where future innovation would happen. The ROI was making sure every smartphone, every video, every ride-share needed Google to exist.
20-year horizon breaks competition - Most investors optimize for 3-5 year exits. Google played a 20-year game buying infrastructure that compounds. SpaceX took 10 years to show gains. DeepMind lost billions before changing AI forever. Long time horizons let you buy what others can't afford to wait for.
The Meta-Strategy: While everyone else builds products, build the platforms those products require. Google's genius wasn't picking winners - it was making sure the winners couldn't win without Google. The best investments don't just grow. They create dependencies that make growth inevitable.
The companies that own the next 20 years are buying infrastructure today that seems too early, too expensive, and too uncertain. That's exactly the point.



